So I won’t pretend that I’ve not cast a shadow of doubt over everything I’ve talked about so far, from evidence to testimonies and trials alike. While it’s purely circumstantial as to whether Samuel could be innocent or not, at this point I find it’s impossible to deny the resounding proof of his guilt.

But just in case you have any doubts…

Samuel’s DNA was found on Michael’s body, forensics confirmed. So yes Samuel was in direct contact with the murder victim. Samuel countered this by claiming his DNA got there thanks to their coffee store encounter earlier that day. Now I’ve watched that video quite a number of times, I like the jury and the prosecution can confidently say he only touches Michael’s chest…

So why was Samuel’s DNA found on Michael’s wrist too?